| Filing Language: English | |
| via Paris Convention | via Nationalization of PCT | 
| Necessary documents: 
 | Necessary documents: 
 | 
| Attachments (if any) 
 | Attachments (if any) 
 | 
- IPONZ conducts formality examination and substantive examination of invention patent applications. The applicant/anyone can submit a request for substantive examination no later than 5 years from the date of application. If there is a request for review, the substantive review cannot be carried out until the 5-year period expires. 
- no 
- via Paris Convention : 6 months from earliest priority date. 
- Multiple designs are allowed in one design application only if the designs belong to the same set (usually used or sold at the same time). 
- Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand - English: Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand, abbreviation: IPONZ - Website: Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (iponz.govt.nz) - New Zealand invention patent search: Search Patent case(s) (iponz.govt.nz) 
- Reinstatement of priority on grounds of "due care" and "unintentional/due care" is accepted. 
- 10 years 
- IPONZ conducts formal and substantive examinations of designs. IPONZ automatically starts the substantive examination within 15 days of receiving the design application, no need for the applicant to submit a specific request separately, the applicant has 12 months (can be extended up to 3 months) to overcome the defect to meet the grant conditions, IPONZ only examines Novelty of exterior design. Designs can only be transferred to others after they have been granted a patent. 
- The novelty grace period of the year preceding the filing date/priority right is granted if: - The disclosure was caused by a third party illegally obtaining patent information
- The disclosure resulted from a breach of confidentiality by a person who obtained the patent information directly or indirectly from the applicant
- The disclosure was made by a government agency or a person authorized by a government in the investigation of an invention
- Disclosure results from a public exercise of reasonableness by the patentee or designee, the original owner of both, or a person with the consent of one of the foregoing
-  A one-year novelty grace period if the evidence is submitted prior to review if the first disclosure was made after December 30, 2018, by:- patentee or designee
- Original right holder of the patentee or designee
- A person with the consent of the original right holder of the patentee or designee
 
 - A novelty grace period of 6 months is available if: - With the consent of the inventor, the invention is exhibited at a specific exhibition or used for the exhibition
- Use or disclose inventions after the above exhibitions
 
- no 
